Asexual Representations in Fiction: Gender, Race, Disability, and Creating More Nuanced Intersectional Possibilities

Project by Polygence alum Emma

Asexual Representations in Fiction: Gender, Race, Disability, and Creating More Nuanced Intersectional Possibilities

Project's result

My project analyzed previous asexual research papers and asexual fictional novels to discover what made asexual representation “good” versus “bad.” After reading Being Ace and Let’s Talk About Love, I concluded that the characters portrayed were positive representations, as none of them suggested that asexuality was a disease or a cause of trauma and these characters had distinct personalities and struggles other than being asexual. I also discovered however, there can still be improvement in making characters more diverse. For instance, most of the characters are white, reflecting the stereotype that portrays white people as' sexually pure’ while suggesting that people of color are “hypersexual.” In addition, even though most research claims the majority asexual characters in film/TV are men, most of the characters in the literature I read are women, meaning there needs to be greater gender diversity in both Film/TV and literature. Finally, even though being disabled is a stereotype for asexuality, these works showed that asexuals can be disabled as long as both aspects of their identity are explored separately.aying asexual characters with these indenties as long as

They started it from zero. Are you ready to level up with us?

Summary

If I had seen an asexual character on TV as a child, I would have realized I was asexual much sooner. Unfortunately, most asexuals' experiences are similar, as they have to rely on informal internet research to understand their lack of sexual attraction. To address this representational gap, this research focuses on the depiction of asexual characters in film, TV shows, and literature while examining two written works: Being Ace: An Anthology of Queer, Trans, Femme, and Disabled Stories of Asexual Love and Connection (ed. Dyer 2023) and Let's Talk About Love (Kann 2018).  I analyzed these works to determine the difference between good and bad representation, arguing that additional dimensions of asexuals’ identity need to be fully fleshed out. I propose a critical reframing of representations considered “bad”: rather than disposing entirely of flawed characters, I argue that there is a great need to re-envision and enrich elements of their portrayal (disability, aromanticism, race). This study concludes with a creative writing exploration of what a realistic representation could look like, based on my lived experiences and addressing the intersection of underrepresented gender(s), race(s), and disability. Rather than erasing stereotypes, this research aims to find ways to create future portrayals that are relatable and informative while normalizing asexuality.

Czarina

Czarina

Polygence mentor

PhD Doctor of Philosophy

Subjects

Arts, Social Science, History, Languages, Literature

Expertise

Social Sciences, Humanities, Sociocultural Anthropology, Ethnography, Qualitative research (Interviews, ethnography)

Emma

Emma

Student

Graduation Year

2027

Project review

“I was pleasantly surprised that I could add my passion for creative writing into the project, and I appreciate my mentor's guidance in finding a journal that would fit my work.”

About my mentor

“Czarina is a great mentor because she is thoughtful, friendly, and gives good advice”